A REB administrator considers the study to be minimal risk and authorized a delegated review instead of a full board review. Is this appropriate?

Prepare for the TCPS 2 Core Exam with our comprehensive quiz. Enhance your understanding of ethical research practices and guidelines. Each question is designed to test your knowledge and provide insightful explanations. Excel in your examination efforts today!

Multiple Choice

A REB administrator considers the study to be minimal risk and authorized a delegated review instead of a full board review. Is this appropriate?

Explanation:
A study that is considered minimal risk can be reviewed via a delegated (expedited) process, but only if the REB approves that path. The authority to decide the review level and to authorize delegated review rests with the REB (often the chair or a designated reviewer under policy). An administrator cannot unilaterally declare that a study will undergo delegated review. Skipping that oversight risks noncompliance with TCPS 2 requirements. If the study meets the criteria and the REB approves, expedited review can proceed; otherwise, it must go to the full board for review.

A study that is considered minimal risk can be reviewed via a delegated (expedited) process, but only if the REB approves that path. The authority to decide the review level and to authorize delegated review rests with the REB (often the chair or a designated reviewer under policy). An administrator cannot unilaterally declare that a study will undergo delegated review. Skipping that oversight risks noncompliance with TCPS 2 requirements. If the study meets the criteria and the REB approves, expedited review can proceed; otherwise, it must go to the full board for review.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy